Recently submitted manuscript primarily goes through plagiarism check. Next step is their screening by the editors: the manuscript might get rejected if it is found to be of insufficient quality, outside focus and scope of the Journal or if they are considered not original.
Editors-in-chief have full authority over the entire editorial content of the journal and the timing of publication of that content with no interference from journal owners.
Editors should defend the confidentiality of authors and peer reviewers (names and reviewer comments).
Author will receive prompt acknowledgement of submission of articles. If acknowledgement is not received within two weeks, please contact the Administrative Office, preferably by e-mail.
Peer Review Policy
Peer review is the critical assessment of manuscripts submitted to journals by experts who are usually not part of the editorial staff. The reviewer assesses the manuscript for quality, originality, validity and whether appropriate method has been followed.
We adhere to the Committee on Publication Ethics Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers policy.
Articles that meet minimal requirements are assigned to three or more reviewers. Peer review process is double blind: identity of reviewers and authors is not revealed to one another.
Newly submitted manuscript primarily goes through plagiarism check. Next step is their screening by the editors: the manuscript might get rejected if it is found to be of insufficient quality, outside focus and scope of the journal or if it is considered not original.
Articles that meet minimal requirements are assigned to the reviewers and we assign it to minimum three reviewers. A reviewer has to provide his feedback on a manuscript within 15 days. The reviewed manuscript is sent to the author for revision. The file corrected by the author is again sent to reviewer.
The final decision on the manuscript is taken by the editor. Only when there are any conflict issues, the editor-in-chief of the journal is involved.
For additional information, please visit Publication Ethics and Malpractice.
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archive of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration.
Advanced Research Publications follows ethical guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Misconduct Allegation Policy
In case of an allegation of misconduct in relation to the material published in the journal, publisher or editors will follow COPE guidelines.
In case of complaint, please feel free to contact us by phone or email:
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.