The price list for 2023 has been released and the issues of 2022 are available in stock. Register now for upcoming conference by emailing us at

Reviewer Policy


All articles published in our journals are subject to double-blind peer review. Reviewers are not included in editorial staff. Review Board in journal(s) publication is an extremely privileged and respectable position. A manuscript is a valuable document and needs to be protected from any exploitation. Following guidelines have been developed on the basis of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers.

Confidentiality: Reviewers should treat any manuscript submitted to them as confidential document, keep all information obtained through peer review confidential and not use for personal advantage.

Assistance in improvement: Reviewers should provide objective comments and formulate observations clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper.

Prompt response: Reviewers should report promptly if they feel unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript.

Conflict of interest: Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Acknowledgment of sources: Reviewers should provide citation of relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. A reviewer should also notify the editors of any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other manuscript (published or unpublished) of which they have personal knowledge.


Don't Hesitate to Ask.

Request a Quote